When is "innocent until proven guilty" a controversial concept? When is an Ohio law designed to protect a homeowner protecting themselves from an intruder interpreted a license for drug dealers to murder one another? And when are self-defense advocates and rank-and-file cops described as saying it's ok to shoot first and ask questions later? When you are a reporter for the Cleveland Plain Dealer or a bureaucrat with the Ohio Prosecutors' Association or Cleveland Police Patrolmen's Association. From the Cleveland Plain Dealer's Reginald Fields story entitled "Innocent before guilty, new self-defense law sides with homeowners protecting their 'castles'": "A homeowner...
Read More...
[Source: Latest Articles - Posted by FreeAutoBlogger]
Ohio elitists react to Castle Doctrine: "Innocent until proven guilty", OH MY!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment